Tracks of politics; Masato Shimizu, journalist

→Japanese

Photo_3  Photo_4Photo_5

At last, we are having the Shugi-in (House of Representatives) election.  Dissolve of Parliament by Minister Koizumi of the time, named “Yusei (Ministry of Post and Telecommunications)” dissolve, and the following Shugi-in election which ended up with the sweeping victory of Jimin-to (Liberal Demographic Party) seems just like yesterday.  But after this, Koizumi, Abe, Fukuda, and Aso respectively became Prime Minister for one year each, which I assume was somewhat a “strange” period of time perhaps to many people.

There are many unclear elements in the background of politics like this, unknown truths hidden behind, but here lies the mission of journalists.

Mr. Masato Shimizu of Nikkei published for us the “documentary record” of the process and record of Kantei initiatives led by PM Koizumi, activities of Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy (Keizai Zaisei Shimon Kaigi), and the drama of 3 PMs taking turns after Koizumi.  Now the record is a “series of 3 books”.

I read through the first book and was very impressed.  Shortly after, he wrote another two books in very timely topics.  I am very pleased about it.

“Kantei initiatives-revolution of Junichiro Koizumi (Kantei syudo – Koizumi Jyunichiro no Kakumei)” (2005)
“Commentaries on the war on Economy and Finance (Keizai Zaisei Senki)” (2007)
“Misstep of the Prime Minister (Shusyo no Satetsu”) (April, 2009)

They are records based on careful coverings by Mr. Shimizu on the national politics of Japan ? what happened, who did what, when, how and what are their meanings and impacts.

It is always the case that newspapers, televisions, or magazines-because of the limits they are imposed of time and space-are not sufficient to make us fully understand about the politics of Japan.  Besides, it takes great effort or almost impossible to try to access to these reports or articles later on.

For this very reason, it is so important and valuable for us Japanese citizens to have a journalist, active in that time, publish a timely book on what happened based on his/her coverage in spite of the very busy life they lead.  It will be a good record, too.  The “Afterword” of his third book illustrates very well the difficulty Mr. Shimizu encountered in catching up with such rapidly changing circumstances.

In newspapers and other medias, journalists cover, study, and write articles on his/her own focused fields (but probably most of their works do not appear on the pages due to editing policies the desks have based on the priorities of the news etc.) but I would say in most cases one article is not enough to cover the issue simply because of the transient nature of newspapers, its limited spaces.  Of course, there are weekly and monthly magazines, series on newspapers too.  And quite a volume of articles are now readable on internet.  But still, I would say that it is quite meaningful to have those information gathered, edited, added and published as a non-fiction.

Are we capable of making an open minded journalism?  This is an issue of consciousness and ethics of organization ? of media relations, journalism.

Media is a huge power that bears tremendous responsibility to the society.  I am weary and tired of our old, never changing “kisha club”, too.  There is no hope if institutions continue to be rigid, or journalists keep on behaving like salary earners.  Remember that the whole world is watching.  Excuses good for Japanese only will not persuade them.

Jaques Attali; A brief history of the future ? a brave and controversial look at the twenty-first century

→Japanese

Photo_2

To trace the history of humans and predict the future ? this is always important at any time.  “Wise men learn from history, fools learn from experience”, “Historia Majistra Vitae”…. East or west, same kind of sayings are inherited.  They are the “wisdom of human kind”. Here in this site also, I have sent out messages of the like for a number of times. (For references in Japanese, please see 1, 2, 3, 4)

In my last posting I introduced a book by Fareed Zakaria, but “a brief history of the future ? a brave and controversial look at the twenty-first century”  written by Jaques Attali, one of the greatest intellectuals of France today, is equally very powerful and provocative.  This book predicts the world in the 21st century by sorting out “keywords to analyze the past and predict how our world will look like in the 21st century” from the long history of human beings. “Laws of history, rules for success are also applicable for future.  Understanding them will enable us to predict how the future will be…”.

For the Japanese edition, a short chapter titled “21st century ? will Japan survive?” is added as well as a chapter titled “Will France survive in the history of the 21st century?” in the end.  Anyway, the Japanese edition looks much more voluminous compared to English edition although I cannot read French original to compare.

Many of you might have seen the 2 hours’ interview with Jack Atari regarding this book on NHK.

The book’s content is structured by 6 chapters:
1. A Very Long History
2. A Brief History of Capitalism
3. The End of the American Empire
4. First Wave of the Future: Planetary Empire
5. Second Wave of the Future: Planetary War
6. Third Wave of the Future: Planetary Democracy

It was first published in 2006, but in “The Beginning of the End” of 2nd chapter it says: “Proliferating, excessive, limitless, and out of control, the American financial system requires profitability rates that industry cannot deliver, to the point where industrial corporations now lend their money in the financial sector rather than invest it in their own activities…” and “”Salary-earners are also increasingly indebted, especially in regard to two public corporations (Fannie Mae, second-ranking American corporation, and the fifth-ranked Freddie Mac), which hold or stand behind five trillion dollars’ worth of mortgage loans, a debt multiplied by four in ten years….” (p.98,99)  Here, we may say that Attalie predicted the subprime mortgage crisis as the financial panic started in the summer of 2007.

Attalie also introduces concept of “Core cities” and writes that “It constantly reinvents itself in a unique shape, around a single center, a single core, which attracts an innovative class (shipbuilders manufacturers, traders, technicians, and financiers) marked by its taste for the new and its passion for discovery.  Until a crisis, or a war, leads to replacement of one core by another. (p.35)

Many “lessons for the future” are given, but here I will list just a few:                  “transmission is a condition of progress" (p.5)
"a new communications technology, seen as a centralizing influence, turns out to be the implacable enemy of the powers that be." (p.50, footnote *1)
"the authoritarian state creates the market, which in its turn creates democracy." (p.69)
"the link between technology and sexuality underpins the whole dynamic of the mercantile order." (p.81)
"many major innovations result from the work of researchers paid out of public funds to look into something utterly different." (p.90)

Sub-titles illustrate brilliantly of the 21st century phenomenon that appears.  For example;
“Nomadic Ubiquity” (Arrival of Nomadic Ubiquity that Changes History)
“Irretrievable Scarcities” (Environment of Earth in the Future)
“Time: The Only True Scarcity” (Time: The Only True Scarcity Left)
And so on…
(In the parenthesis are sub-titles from Japanese edition for your reference.)

Then, the 4th Chapter begins.  First, second, and third waves of the future are described.

How can I describe the content?  Stimulating, horrifying, provocative… I have a feeling that most of them will actually realize.  There are many signs even now.

After reading, I thought of Jared Diamond’s book “Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed

I recommend these books in addition to “The Post-American World”.  Please keep them in your mind and read whenever you have opportunities.

Footnote 1:  I also have been pointing out the weakness of “Vertical Society” in a “Flat World” by quoting Latin words “Incunabulum, Incunabula” in number of lectures.  For instance, please see my columns 1, 2, or 3.

The Post-American World

→Japanese

Fareed Zakaria (born in 1964) is a young, aggressive journalist – most active and "hot" in the world today.  Besides being an editor of Newsweek International Edition he runs his own web site.

In 2008 Zakaria published a book titled "Post-American World".  The book is very interesting – with rich, inspiring contents.  Apparently Zakaria has wonderful lucidity, exceptionally good writing ability, great vision and broad views.  This is without doubt one of the books that I would like to recommend to all – especially to young people.

The book consists of following contents (The English translation of the titles in Japanese edition are given within the parenthesis for your reference);

1. The Rise of the Rest (The Rise of "All Nations Except America")
2. The Cup Runneth Over (Power is Shifting in a Global Scale)
3. A Non-Western World? (A New World Where "Non-Western" and "Western" World Mix)
4. The Challenger (China Heads Toward "Asymmetrical Superpower")
5. The Ally (India – A Nation Burdened with Destiny of Democracy)
6. American Power (Will America Keep on Falling?)
7. American Purpose (Can America Globalize Herself?)

The book not only introduces a view of the world that holds America and China as the center of policy and economy but naturally, as Zakaria was born and brought up in India until age of 18, also takes into account the medium-long perspective and challenges of India that makes this book even more interesting, offering a slightly different point of view compared to other books under this kind of a theme.

"The Post-American World" is a world where America ceases to be the only superpower and "The Rise of the Rest" takes place.  In that respect, China and India will have exceptionally strong impact in the world because of their large population although their tremendous growth will inevitably be accompanied by countless challenges.  His insight here is quite something.

Zakaria studied at distinguished schools in Dubai, continued education at Yale University, earned his PhD in Politics at Harvard.  At an astonishingly young age of 27, he was appointed to the chief editor of Foreign Affairs (a publication of Council of Foreign Affairs), and from 2000 to date is working for Newsweek.

His view of America as a "Big Island Country" matches with my view; I also talk about it in lectures and other occasions.  In the last part of chapter 2 Zakaria writes (p.47-48);

"American politicians constantly and promiscuously demand, label, sanction, and condemn whole countries for myriad failings.  Over the last fifteen years, the United States has placed sanctions on half the world’s population.  We are the only country in the world to issue annual report cards on every other country’s behavior.  Washington, D.C., has become a bubble, smug and out of touch with the world outside."

"The 2007 Pew Global Attitudes Survey (Pew Research Center; one of the nonpartisan think tank of America = footnote) showed a remarkable increase worldwide in positive views about free trade, marets, and democracy.  Large majorities in countries from China and Germany to Bangladesh and Nigeria said that growing trade ties between countries were good.  Of the forty-seven countries polled, however, the one that came in dead last in terms of support for free trade was the United States.  In the five years the survey has been done, no country has seen as great a drop-off as the United States."

"Or take a look at the attitudes toward foreign companies.  When asked whether they had a positive impact, a surprisingly large number of people in countries like Brazil, Nigeria, India, and Bangladesh said yes.  Those countries have typically been suspicious of Western multinationals.  (South Asia’s unease has some basis;  after all, it was initially colonized by a multinational corporation, the British East India Company.)  And yet, 73 percent in India, 75 percent in Bangladesh, 70 percent in Brazil, and 82 percent in Nigeria now have positive views of these companies.  The figure for America, in contrast, is 45 percent, which places us in the bottom five.  We want the world to accept American companies with open arms, but when they come here ? that’s a different matter."

"Attitudes on immigration represent an even larger reversal.  On an issue where the United States has been the model for the world, the country has regressed toward an angry defensive couch.  Where we once wanted to pioneer every new technology, we now look at innovation fearfully, wondering how it will change things."

"The irony is that the rise of the rest is a consequence of American ideas and actions.  For sixty years, American politicians and diplomats have traveled around the world pushing countries to open their markets, free up their politics, and embrace trade and technology.  We have urged peoples in distant lands to take up the challenge of competing in the global economy, freeing up their currencies, and developing new industries.  We counseled them to be unafraid of change and learn the secrets of our success.  And it worked: the natives have gotten good at capitalism."

"But now we are becoming suspicious of the very things we have long celebrated ? free markets, trade, immigration, and technological change.  And all this is happening when the tide is going our way.  Just as the world is opening up, America is closing down."

"Generations from now, when historians write about these times, they might note that, in the early decades of the twenty-first century, the United States succeeded in its great and historic mission ? it globalized the world.  But along the way, they might write, it forgot to globalize itself."

Footnote: Recently the Center supported a research related to international arguments on whaling and I participated in some of its meetings.  This April, the Center produced "A Roadmap for US-China Cooperation on Energy and Climate Change" in collaboration with Asia Society.

Zakaria also points out that the best industry of America is "University Education". 
His early education was in "Asian" method ・・・in which the premium is placed on memorization and constant testing・・・I recall memorizing vast quantities of material, regurgitating it for exams, and then promptly forgetting it."

"When I went to college in the United States, I encountered a different world.  While the American system is to lax on rigor and memorization…..it is much better at developing the critical faculties of the mind, which is what you need to succeed in life.  Other educational systems teach you to take tests; the American system teaches you to think." (p.193)

"Tharman Shanmugaratnam, until recently Singapore’s minister of education, explains the difference between his country’s system and America’s.  "We both have meritocracies," Shanmugaratnam says.  "Yours is a talent meritocracy, ours is an exam meritocracy.  We know how to train people to take exams.  You know how to use people’s talents to the fullest.  Both are important, but there are some parts of the intellect that we are not able to test well – like creativity, curiosity, a sense of adventure, ambition.  Most of all, America has a culture of learning that challenges conventional wisdom, even if it means challenging authority・・・." (p.193,194)

I think this argument is persuasive since America’s higher education contributed much to Dr. Zakaria’s success in becoming a world class opinion leader at such an surprisingly young age.  Compare this with Japanese higher education and think very hard, please.

Zakaria says, however, that "America remains by far the most attractive destination for students・・・All these advantages will not be erased easily, because the structure of European and Japanese universitiesp―mostly state-run bureaucracies―is unlikely to change."  He also points out that "・・・while China and India are opening new institutions, it is not that easy to create a world-class university out of whole cloth in a few decades." (p.191)

Keynes and Schumpeter

→Japanese

0907231

Lehman Shock (September, 2008) that started from Wall Street has triggered financial crisis and doldrums of economy in a global scale which still seems to be far from ending.  Each nation crafted stimulus packages and put them into action that now the picture looks more like policy competition in a broad sense.

Here is where Keynes, and Schumpeter who set "Innovation" at the center of economics attract attention.  Schumpeter seemed to have been a strong opponent of Keynes.  Why is it then that these two "contradicting" economists are both necessary?

Recently a book on these two giants of economics in the early 20th century was published; "Now is the time to learn from Keynes and Schumpeter (Imakoso Keynes to Schumpeter ni manabe)" by Dr. Hiroshi Yoshikawa.  This is a very stimulating book.  Dr. Yoshikawa has written this book based on strict verifications and inspections – which is his style.  The content is even entertaining – not written for economists – so it was fairly understandable even for a person like myself.

These two giants, Keynes and Schumpeter, were born in 1883 with just 4 months’ difference; in Cambridge, Great Britain and Vienna, Austria (Moravia, Kingdom of Hungary・・・ current eastern Czech Republic), and the year they died were only 4 years apart (Keynes in 1946, two years after Bretton Woods Agreements and Schumpeter in 1950.)  I recommend "Currency in Flame (Tsuka Moyu/the URL is in Japanese)" by Tomohiko Taniguchi on this topic.  It gives you good understanding of the age and place they lived, the background of their upbringing, education they had, relations with their mentors, and so on.

The book is a good reference with inspiring, rich content on policymaking which could be useful to Japan today.

There were many places that I found especially interesting and below are just few of the examples:

1. "・・・what are the motives for the enterprise operators (footnote) to go into new joints?  By no means they seek after financial benefits or money.  Schumpeter declares・・・and even goes on further to say "If this sort of desire appears it indicates not stagnation of their conventional activities but decline, not fulfillment of their missions but sign of their mortal deaths."  ・・・Schumpeter very clearly writes about typological classifications of industrial people・・・" (p.56,57)

Footnote: I telephoned Dr. Yoshikawa about difference between "enterprise operators" and "entrepreneurs".  He said that economists do not use the term "entrepreneurs" but instead "enterprise operators".  However, he added, "entrepreneurs" might be better understood by average readers.  So, please feel free to understand the term "enterprise operators, business operators" as "entrepreneurs".

2. "The business people as defined by Schumpeter – the heros/heroines that make capitalism the capitalism as is meant to be – are people born with special talents that are not bestowed to ordinary people.  Innovation is by no means created solely from rational calculations.  Rather, it is created only by business people who have irresistible impulse or ‘talents’ as I put it, that make them yearn for innovation.

Here, The Birth of Tragedy(1872), maiden work by Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche(1844-1900) comes to my mind.  Nietzsche discussed the history of classic Greek tragedies by using two opposing ideas of ‘Apollonian’ and ‘Dionysian’.  Apollo, the god of Sun gives clear figure to everything through its light.  Intellect/reasoning is thus Apollonian.  On the other hand the essence of Dionysus, god of wine, is frenzy/intoxication.  ‘Business operator spirit’ defined by Schumpeter is clearly Dionysian just as ‘Animal spirits’ in Keynes is." (p.227, 228)

About economy and decline in population

3. "Keynes discussed relations between decline in population and economy in a very scholarly way as economist – as this is very much his style.  On the contrary, words by Schumpeter are by far "discussions on civilizations"". (p.210)

And

4. "But eventually, as capitalism develops, business operators as plain human beings start transformation to ‘ordinary people’ that maximize ‘benefit’ of self.  What happens at the point of maximization of individuals’ benefit?  The moment people start rationally calculating the cost of bearing a child and raising it, decline in population will begin.  Schumpeter counts decline in population as one of the signs of decay in the spirit of business operation." (p.229-230)

How did these two giants of economics perceive of each other?  This is another very interesting human drama.

I strongly recommend this book to you.  It is "Onko Chishin (to learn new lessons by studying the past)."
Also, "Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism" by George A. Akerlof and Robert J. Shiller was published recently.  After reading this book, here are some of my thoughts about policy makings of Japan during these 6 months.

Speed is of course important but it does not justify pumping in tax payers’ money into society easily without inspection saying this is "once in 100 years" crisis (Greenspan, former chairman of FRB).  Sometimes it is forced by political dynamics but if you look into supplementary budgets, for instance, the budgets are almost scattering about of money with bureaucratic sectionalism.  I must say that people lack leadership; policy makers, industries, academics, and scientists… all of them.

If it is "once in 100 years", although doubt remains, clear vision and policies must be introduced for the major changes that need to take place several years from now.  And we don’t have them.  I have been pointing this out repeatedly in my blog and many other places. (Ref: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  *3,4,5,6 are in Japanese.)

Is the industrial framework OK as it is?  Can we expect "Innovators" to emerge in current industries?

What we need in society, in any place of the society, are "Innovators".  In other words, "Nails that stick out", "People with spirit of enterprise" ・・・.  These kinds of people are strongly needed at time like this.

India, California, and Tokyo

→Japanese

A cheerful meeting titled "Japan-India-U.S. Relationship Fiesta" have been held in Tokyo, co-organaized by Indian Institute of Technology(IIT), University of California at Los Angeles(UCLA), and University of California at Berkeley(UCB) Japan Alumni Association.

Former Ambassador of Japan to India His Excellency Enoki and former Ambassador of India to Japan His Excellency Seth participated also.  There was a panel and have a nice Networking time.  See the animoto slideshow for the views.

It is good to see this kind of gatherings being held here and there.

Visitors from Canada

→Japanese

Recently we have had a number of topics related to Canada (Ref. 1, 2) and I assume that this is partly because this year is the year of 80th anniversary of Japan-Canada relations and more exchanges/events are taking place than usual.

Ms. Olivia Chow, member of House of Commons of Canada came to my office at GRIPS with Mr. Christopher Burton, First Secretary (Political) at the Canadian Embassy.  Dr. Sunami and I have just returned from Toronto, so there were lots of topics to share.  The time just flew away.  Ms. Chow said that she and Prof. Ito Peng were colleagues.

Img_0904

Photo: Ms. Chow, Mr. Burton, Dr. Sunami

You never know who is connected to whom.  And I tell you this is exciting. No matter where you are or whenever it is, you will be evaluated as an "individual" and will be connected to even more friends and colleagues.

Seize the Opportunity, Time for Big Change. But Where are Leaders?

→Japanese

Situation of Japan is not good at all.  Of course, same can be said for the rest of the world.  Everybody is trying to make changes and searching for future perspectives of politics, industry, economy, education, etc.

As for the national vision as I see it, I have been sending out messages again and again from the start of the New Year.  On the April 25 issue of Diamond Weekly Magazine(in Japanese only) an article based on interview with me was published under the title of "Let Japan go and sell clean energy technologies to China & India ! "(the article is in Japanese only).  Here, as always, people give countless reasons why they cannot change, why they cannot do.  In politics, industries, or whatever, I urge the leaders to straighten up.

Mr. Hatoyama was elected the President of the Democratic Party.  How will the politics move?

In Japan, people are talking mostly about the revised budget which is almost "dumping" of public resources, and this is greatly affecting the political situation.  It appears to be "scattering money" to vested interest groups, "lucky dips" by Ministries and Departments.  No one is drawing visions for the future nor seizing this rare chance for a drastic change.  I can even hear irresponsible big laughter of some people.

Same thing for science and technology policies.  A mega budget of 300 billion yen( 3.1 billion dollars) was appropriated like a bolt from the blue.  But for what and how?  Please watch carefully.  It is of a very different kind compared to the science and technology policies of President Obama.

A nation not investing to young generation has no future.  It is very important to let young people see and experience the broad world outside so to prepare them for the global age.  Young people are precisely "the" asset of the nation in the future.

From Toronto-2

→Japanese

It’s Saturday, May 2nd and the "swine flu" news are all over the place.  In the afternoon, I went to the University of Toronto again, this time to the Massey College.  The College is located just on the opposite side of yesterday’s Munk Center.  I went to see my old friend, Dr. John Dirks  who is in charge of the Gairdner award.  It’s been 5 years since we met last time.  Dr. Arimoto joined us from Washington DC where he was participating in the AAAS meeting. We spent approximately 1 hour in an old fashioned, elegant, somewhat small library of the College.

As I have reported in this blog, in the year of the 50th anniversary of the award two Japanese scientists-Drs. Yamanaka and Mori-were awarded so I went to pay a courtesy visit.  I also heard about the awarding ceremony that will take place in October as well as various events being planned in celebration of the anniversary.

After this, I had an opportunity to see Prof. Jun Nogami.  Dr. Nogami is the leading scientist of Canada Nanotech, nano-materials and I met him at the Canadian Embassy in Tokyo this February when he was visiting Japan with Nanotech research promotion inspection party of Canada.

Mvi_17331

Photo1:  At the Massey College with Drs. Dirks and Arimoto.

Img_1735_photo2

Photo2:  With Drs. Nogami and Sunami.

Then, discussion with Dr. Peter Singer (Ref. 1, 2)  on common topics including the agenda of next year’s G8 summit to be hosted by Canada.

In the evening, Prof. Ito Peng, her friend, Drs Arimoto, Sunami and I enjoyed nice dinner at "Sotto Sotto".  The dessert was of course "Ice Wine."  I was told that Japanese are the best customers.

Washington-3: From the World Bank

→Japanese

I did a lecture at the World Bank in January 2008 (Ref. 1, 2 ) and right after that we co-organized a Global Health Summit in Tokyo in February 2008.  I believe that these activities were very helpful in building strong mutual trust and understanding.  During my visit to Washington DC, from the morning of April 30, schedule was arranged for me to discuss about science and technology policy with special focus on African development for 4 hours.

In Japan, through 2008 TICAD4 (Ref. 1, 2 ) and meetings related to G8 Summit, policies are made to reinforce African development and eventually develop "Science and Technology diplomacy" (I have been advocating this for many years・・・) the movement which is prominent also in academies of Japan, U.S., and other countries where they are together working to build a system of mutual cooperation

What role is the Science and Technology policy of the World Bank capable to play to address the global issues of today’s drastically changing world is a great challenge. It was a good opportunity to advertise Japan’s policies since Japanese delegates had just returned from their tour on Science and Technology in Africa and their findings were reported at a conference in Tokyo recently.  JBIC (Japan Bank for International Cooperation) and JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) also participated from Japan and contributed to making the discussion lively.  It was well received.

Img_1722

Photo1: At the World Bank with Secretary Ueda of the Embassy of Japan.

Below are some of the scenes from the Science, Technology and Innovation Capacity Building Partnership Meeting at the World Bank .

1_breakfast_7

Photo2: Breakfast

2_fedoroff_mcpherson_5

Photo3: Drs Nina Fedoroff (Ref. 1)and Peter McPherson

3_watkins_at_breakfast_1_5

Photo4: Dr. Alfred Watkins (Ref. 1) of the World Bank and Dr. Andrew Reynolds of UNAID

4_delvoie_panel

Photo5: From left; Drs Victor Hwang (T2 Venture Capital), Christian Delvoie, Phillip Griffiths

Expectations of the world is high for Japan and indeed Japan is capable in making large contributions in many different ways but it seems to me that current domestic climate is somewhat sadly introverted.  For current crisis, it is crucial for the political leaders to catch this opportunity of "once in 100 years" disaster to show national vision that shows strong determination to change reluctant Japan to meet today’s global needs.  If not, the cool-headed world would treat Japan accordingly; as a nation not-worth-taking-seriously, and no international negotiations or top diplomacy would make meaningful differences whatsoever (by Funabashi, Editor in Chief).  How much are we, although still economically the 2nd largest, communicating to the world our will, determination, and policies and how seriously does the world take them?  I regret to say that "Japan Missing" is the world’s feeling towards our nation.

Washington-2: Atlantic Council

→Japanese

There are many think-tanks in Washington.  Among them CSIS, Brookings are well known in Japan also.  Some Japanese go to these think-tanks to study, but I think their number is too small for a nation of the 2nd largest economy in the world.  It is important to be in those think-tanks not only to gain knowledge but also to make connections in Washington, to understand how the politic works and how policies are made.  We should be more seriously involved in this.

Atlantic Council is another example of those think-tanks.  Its works are very closely related to politics.  Mr. Kempe, after a long and prominent career at Wall Street Journal, has become President and Chief Executive Officer of the Atlantic Council and its activities are expanding ever since.

National Security Advisor is known to be the most important post in the White House and General James Jones, the former Chairman of Atlantic Council, was appointed to take this position.

As you may see from the website of Atlantic Council, the organization was established in recognition of the importance of relations of Atlantic community of both sides.  To meet the challenges of this global age, the Council is actively working and reporting on U.S.-China relations, new energy, etc. as well as on Asia.  Here again, I must say that Japan’s presence is extremely weak.

I attended 2009 Leadership Award Dinner by invitation from Mr. Kempe. About 900 people were there.  Please visit the website by all means.  Since this year was the 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin wall, awards were given to the top of the United States and West Germany of the time; former President Bush (the father) and Prime Minister Kohl as well as IBM Chairman of the Board Mr. Palmisano, General Petraeus, and Thomas Hampson (a singer).

Former Secretary of State Mr. Colin Powell, Secretary of Defence Robert Gates and many government high officials, legislators, Ambassadors from 46 countries, etc. were there at the party. It was truly a fantastic gathering.  My seat was next to Ambassador Fujisaki.

Speeches by the recipients were nice too – they all looked very comfortable in giving speeches. General Petraeus’ "joke" was fun. I invite you to listen to them on the web.

I also saw several friends from China.  They were all at one table inviting Chinese connections.